🔗 Share this article

Thhese days present a very unusual phenomenon: the first-ever US parade of the caretakers. They vary in their qualifications and traits, but they all possess the common mission – to stop an Israeli violation, or even destruction, of the delicate truce. After the hostilities finished, there have been few occasions without at least one of the former president's representatives on the territory. Only in the last few days featured the presence of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and Marco Rubio – all coming to carry out their duties.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In only a few days it initiated a wave of operations in the region after the killings of two Israeli military soldiers – resulting, based on accounts, in scores of local injuries. Several ministers called for a renewal of the war, and the Israeli parliament approved a preliminary measure to take over the occupied territories. The US reaction was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

However in more than one sense, the US leadership appears more focused on maintaining the existing, tense period of the truce than on progressing to the subsequent: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Regarding this, it seems the United States may have goals but few tangible strategies.

For now, it is uncertain when the planned multinational governing body will actually assume control, and the identical applies to the proposed peacekeeping troops – or even the composition of its soldiers. On a recent day, a US official stated the United States would not force the membership of the international contingent on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s government persists to reject various proposals – as it did with the Turkish suggestion lately – what occurs next? There is also the reverse point: who will decide whether the units preferred by the Israelis are even prepared in the mission?

The issue of the duration it will need to disarm the militant group is equally vague. “The expectation in the leadership is that the global peacekeeping unit is going to at this point take charge in demilitarizing the organization,” stated Vance recently. “It’s going to take a period.” The former president only reinforced the lack of clarity, saying in an conversation on Sunday that there is no “fixed” timeline for Hamas to lay down arms. So, in theory, the unidentified participants of this yet-to-be-formed international force could deploy to Gaza while Hamas militants continue to remain in control. Are they facing a governing body or a insurgent group? Among the many of the issues arising. Others might question what the result will be for everyday civilians under current conditions, with Hamas persisting to attack its own opponents and opposition.

Latest incidents have yet again highlighted the gaps of Israeli reporting on both sides of the Gaza frontier. Each source attempts to analyze all conceivable angle of the group's infractions of the ceasefire. And, typically, the reality that Hamas has been stalling the return of the remains of deceased Israeli hostages has monopolized the news.

On the other hand, reporting of non-combatant casualties in the region caused by Israeli operations has garnered minimal focus – or none. Consider the Israeli response strikes in the wake of a recent southern Gaza event, in which a pair of military personnel were fatally wounded. While Gaza’s sources reported dozens of casualties, Israeli media commentators criticised the “limited reaction,” which focused on just installations.

That is not new. Over the previous few days, Gaza’s media office accused Israel of infringing the truce with Hamas 47 times since the truce began, resulting in the loss of 38 individuals and injuring another many more. The assertion was insignificant to the majority of Israeli media outlets – it was merely missing. That included reports that eleven individuals of a local family were lost their lives by Israeli forces recently.

The rescue organization said the group had been attempting to return to their home in the a Gaza City neighbourhood of the city when the vehicle they were in was attacked for reportedly crossing the “demarcation line” that demarcates areas under Israeli military command. This boundary is invisible to the naked eye and is visible only on maps and in official documents – often not accessible to everyday people in the region.

Yet that event scarcely got a reference in Israeli news outlets. A major outlet mentioned it briefly on its website, quoting an IDF representative who stated that after a suspicious transport was detected, troops fired cautionary rounds towards it, “but the car kept to advance on the soldiers in a manner that created an immediate risk to them. The forces opened fire to eliminate the risk, in compliance with the truce.” Zero fatalities were reported.

Amid such narrative, it is understandable many Israeli citizens feel the group solely is to blame for breaking the truce. That belief threatens fuelling appeals for a stronger stance in the region.

Sooner or later – perhaps in the near future – it will not be sufficient for all the president’s men to play supervisors, instructing the Israeli government what to refrain from. They will {have to|need